WAYS OF TEACHING THE INTERPRETATION OF AESTHETIC CATEGORY AND THEORETICAL CONCEPTS IN LITERATURE LESSONS

Saodat Kambarova

Аннотация

The last decade was characterized by the rapid development of aesthetics and literary science: non-classical categories of aesthetics became the object of research of academic aesthetics; new approaches to the problems of literary theory were formed. In particular, the idea of multiple methods of teaching literature was taught on modern literary theory, the synthesis of the aesthetics of oral creativity, a detailed system of theoretical and historical poetics and concepts, the literary process of the 21st century was perceived in a new way. This article explains that the quality of students' acquisition of literary-theoretical concepts and aesthetic categories depends on the teacher's ability to competently organize the process of literary education and manage their acquisition. In addition, the study of interrelated concepts such as "author - work - reader" will contribute to the preparation of the reader with the ability to appreciate the artistic work.

Как цитировать

Kambarova, S. (2023). WAYS OF TEACHING THE INTERPRETATION OF AESTHETIC CATEGORY AND THEORETICAL CONCEPTS IN LITERATURE LESSONS. Журнал иностранных языков и лингвистики, 6(2). извлечено от https://phys-tech.jdpu.uz/index.php/fll/article/view/8854

Библиографические ссылки

. Antipova, A.M. (2005). The relationship of theoretical-literary and aesthetic categories and concepts in the school course. DSc Thesis. Moscow. p. 44

. Bogdanova, O.Yu., Leonov, S.A., Chertov, V.F. (2004). Methods of teaching literature. Moscow: Publishing Center “Academy”. P.400

. Dekusheva, R.A. (1981). Optimization of the process of developing a reading culture among students of Karachay schools in the system of optional and extracurricular classes in Russian literature: PhD thesis. Moscow. p.2

. Zunnunov, A., Esonov, Zh., Hotamov, N., Ibrohimov, A. (1992). Literature teaching methodology. Tashkent. p.332

. Leontev, A.A. (2001). Language and speech activity in general and pedagogical psychology. Moscow. pp.246-253.

. Matchonov, S. M. (1996). Independent works from literature at school. Tashkent. p.208.

. Mirkosimova, M.M. (1995). Methods of forming and improving students' literary analysis skills. Ped. science. doc. ... diss. Tashkent. p.253.

. Niyozmetova, R.Kh. (2007). Theoretical and methodological foundations of studying Uzbek literature in the continuing education system (in the case of Russian groups): Ped. science. doc. ... diss. Tashkent. p.242.

. Novikov, L.A. (1991). Art word. Moscow. p.144.

. Prantsova G.V., Romanicheva E.S. (2014). Methodology education literature. Practicum. Moscow. p.272.

. Khalizev, V. E. (2002). Theory literature. Moscow. Second Edition. p.268.

. Yoldoshev, Q. (1997). Updated pedagogical thinking and scientific-methodical foundations of literature teaching in secondary schools. Ped. science. doc. ... diss. Tashkent. p.306.

. Husanboeva, Q.P. (2006). Scientific-methodological foundations of teaching students to think independently in the process of literary education: Ped. science. doc. ... diss. Tashkent. p.262.